If you are taking them from a drone, it’s theoretically possible that the drone can add metadata that indicates the exact extent of the land seen in the image, but Lightroom would have no knowledge of this extra metadata.This is a powerful metadata tool for your photos and videos. I don’t know much about overlays in Google Earth, but unless you’re taking photos from a drone, I wouldn’t think they’d be appropriate for overlyaing. Photo locations in Lightroom are (intended to be) the location of the camera at the moment the shot was taken, and could be a long distance from what’s seen in the photo. Can you explain how your tool correctly positions the coordinates of the image from the metadata onto Google Earth? Also, do you know of a more precise way to overlay a georeferenced image onto Google Earth? Is there a difference between default coordinate systems? Thanks! Google supplies anchors to reposition and resize the image, but this seems totally against the point of importing a georeferenced image.

However, when I use the image overlay tool in Google Earth Pro, the tiff file is not positioned correctly over the field. I noticed that when I open the “Map via embedded coordinates” link (I am using Google) that the pin is indeed positioned correctly over the area of interest (a vineyard). I am working with georeferenced images (RedEdge multi-spectral sensor). Many have their Exifįinally, I should note that my viewer makes use of Phil Harvey's most I use the viewer a lot on images I see in the Digital Photography Review Samples and You're viewing a page with an image you want to check out, just click theīutton and you'll be whisked to a new tab showing the image's data. Safari, you have the added benefit that you can install an Exif-viewerīutton on your button-bar toolbar. You can also check images on your local hard drive - images directly fromĪ camera generally have the most information. A Qualitative Analysis of NEF Compression.Photoshop Calendar-Template-Building Script.

Exif data viewer app